Bar pilots: pilotage rates.
Summary
Existing law provides for the regulation and licensing of pilots for Monterey Bay and the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun and for the payment of specified pilotage rates and charges imposed on vessels piloted in those bays. Existing law also establishes, in the Transportation Agency, a Board of Pilot Commissioners for the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun and prescribes the membership, functions, and duties of the board with regard to the licensure and regulation of bar pilots. Existing law prescribes the rates of bar pilotage fees required to be charged by pilots and paid by vessels inward and outward bound through those bays and requires the board to recommend that the Legislature, by statute, adopt a schedule of pilotage rates providing fair and reasonable return to pilots piloting vessels in those bays. Existing law also imposes, among other things, a board operations surcharge of up to 7.5% of all bar pilotage fees charged by bar pilots, which is paid into the State Treasury to the credit of the Board of Pilot Commissioners' Special Fund and continuously appropriated to the board to compensate the board and the agency for their services and expenses. This bill would revise the process for changing the rates of those bar pilotage fees to instead require the board to adopt a schedule of pilotage rates. The bill would further require the board to adopt regulations, as provided, for the adjustment of rates for pilotage services, and would prescribe procedures for the board to review and adjust those pilotage rates, as specified. By authorizing the board to adjust the rates of bar pilotage fees, which may increase bar pilotage fees and thereby may increase the amount of the board operations surcharge and the amount of moneys paid into the fund, the bill would make an appropriation.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jul 2020
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2019
Last action Jul 1, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly May 2, 2019
How they voted
68–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 71
May 2, 2019
D
Democratic54
94% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican16
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
8
Committee
12
Jul 1, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Jun 24, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jul 9, 2019
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 26, 2019
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
In committee: Testimony taken. Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 4, 2019
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 16, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 2, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1478.)
lower
Apr 24, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (April 24).
lower
Apr 2, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 28, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 14, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Rob Bonta
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1372
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1372. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline