AB 1349 California Assembly · 2019-2020 Regular Session

Civil actions: discovery.

Summary
Existing law governs discovery in civil actions, and allows a party to obtain discovery from another party through written interrogatories and requests for admission, among others. Under existing law, each response by the responding party to these discovery requests is required to include the same number or letter, and be in the same sequence, as the corresponding discovery request, as specified, but is not required to repeat the text of the particular discovery request. In order to facilitate the discovery process, this bill would, upon request in one of the aforementioned discovery methods, require a party to provide the requesting party with the document propounding or responding to the discovery request in electronic format within 3 court days of the request, except as specified. If a responding party requests and receives a discovery request in electronic format, the bill would require the responding party to include the text of the interrogatory immediately preceding any response. The bill would also provide that a party may provide the requested electronic format in any format, and may transmit the document by any method, as agreed upon by the parties, except as specified.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jun 2019
Assembly Passage
Apr 2019
Senate Passage
Jul 2019
Signed into Law
Aug 2019
Introduced Feb 22, 2019 Signed Aug 30, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Jul 11, 2019 · Assembly Apr 22, 2019

How they voted

330
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 34
Jul 11, 2019
D Democratic26
26 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican8
7 Yea 1
87% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
21
Key actions
10
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Aug 30, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 12, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2661.).
lower
Jul 11, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 9 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2052.).
upper
Jun 26, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 25).
upper
Jun 10, 2019
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 1, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1260.)
lower
Apr 8, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 4, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 2).
lower
Mar 21, 2019
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 11, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Jay Obernolte
Jay Obernolte
RRepublican
CA
33