Traffic violator school: fees.
Summary
Existing law requires the clerk of the court to collect a fee from every person who is ordered or permitted to attend a traffic violator school pursuant to specified provisions of law, in an amount equal to the total bail set forth for the eligible offense on the uniform countywide bail schedule. Existing law authorizes the clerk to accept a payment of at least 10% of the required fee upon filing a written agreement by the defendant to pay the remaining amount according to an installment schedule of up to 90 days. Under existing law, the clerk is also required to collect a fee from the person to cover administrative and clerical costs, as specified. This bill would extend the length of the installment payment period to a minimum of 180 days, and would authorize a longer payment schedule if necessary as a result of the defendant's financial circumstances. The bill would require the court to waive the fee if the defendant agrees to perform community service. The bill would delete the requirement for the clerk to collect the administrative and clerical costs fee. Existing law authorizes the court to convert the fee to bail, declare it forfeited, and report the forfeiture as a conviction if a defendant fails to make an installment payment of the fee according to an installment agreement, and authorizes the court to charge a failure to pay and impose a civil assessment, or issue an arrest warrant, for a failure to pay the fee. This bill would delete the court's authorization to issue an arrest warrant for a failure to pay, and would instead authorize a court to take those other actions if a defendant willfully fails to make an installment payment of the fee according to an installment agreement without good cause or if a defendant willfully fails to pay without good cause, respectively.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2019
Last action Aug 30, 2019
Floor votes · Assembly May 23, 2019
How they voted
75–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 77
May 23, 2019
D
Democratic59
96% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican17
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
7
Committee
11
Aug 30, 2019
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 12, 2019
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 9, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 25, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 6, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and PUB. S.
upper
May 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1885.)
lower
May 16, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (May 16).
lower
Apr 24, 2019
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 2, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 26, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 11, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Eloise Reyes
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1310
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1310. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline