Information security.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes the Department of Technology within the Government Operations Agency. Existing law requires each state agency and certain designated state entities, on or before February 1 of each year, to submit to the Department of Technology a summary of their actual and projected information technology and telecommunications costs and a summary of their actual and projected information security costs, as specified. This bill would, instead, require each state agency to comply with those provisions and would define state agency for these purposes to mean every state office, officer, department, division, bureau, board, and commission, except for the California State University. (2) Existing law establishes the Office of Information Security within the Department of Technology, headed by the Chief of the Office of Information Security. Existing law requires the chief to establish an information security program and requires that program to include specified responsibilities, including coordinating the activities of state agency information security officers for purposes of integrating statewide security initiatives and ensuring compliance with information security and privacy policies and standards. Existing law requires specified state entities to implement and comply with the policies and procedures issued by the office. This bill would require each state agency to comply with the policies and procedures issued by the Office of Information Security, and would define state agency for these purposes to mean every state office, officer, department, division, bureau, board, and commission, except for the California State University.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2019
Last action Feb 3, 2020
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
5
Committee
8
Amendments
2
May 16, 2019
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 15, 2019
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 1, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 29, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 24).
lower
Apr 24, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on G.O. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Apr 22, 2019
Committee
(pending re-referral to Com. on G.O.)
lower
Apr 22, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Mar 11, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and G.O.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jacqui Irwin
DDemocratic
Co
Evan Low
DDemocratic
Co
Mike Gipson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1242
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1242. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline