Public employees' retirement: pension fund management: in-state infrastructure.
Summary
The California Constitution confers upon the retirement boards of public retirement systems plenary authority and fiduciary responsibility for the investment of moneys of those systems. Existing law authorizes the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System, the Teachers' Retirement Board of the State Teachers' Retirement System, and the board of retirement or the board of investments of a retirement system established pursuant to the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, consistent with their fiduciary duties and investment standards, to prioritize investment in an in-state infrastructure project over a comparable out-of-state infrastructure project. This bill would require a state agency that is responsible for infrastructure projects to produce a list of priority infrastructure projects for funding consideration by the retirement boards, as described above, and to provide it to them. The bill would require a state agency also to provide further project information to a board upon request. The bill would define a state agency for these purposes as the Department of Transportation and the Department of Water Resources.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Vetoed
Oct 2019
Introduced Feb 21, 2019
Vetoed Oct 9, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Sep 5, 2019 · Assembly May 29, 2019
How they voted
32–8
Passed
Total votes 40
Sep 5, 2019
D
Democratic29
100% Yea
R
Republican11
72% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
11
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Jan 21, 2020
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 9, 2019
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 9, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 60. Noes 17. Page 3144.).
lower
Sep 6, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 8 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 5, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 32. Noes 8. Page 2562.).
upper
Aug 19, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 17, 2019
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jul 2, 2019
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 26, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 12, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
May 29, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 58. Noes 15. Page 2091.)
lower
May 16, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 16, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 3.) (May 16).
lower
May 1, 2019
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 24, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 11, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marc Levine
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1212
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1212. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline