AB 1190 California Assembly · 2019-2020 Regular Session

Unmanned aircraft: state and local regulation: limitations.

Summary
Existing law prohibits a person from knowingly and intentionally operating an unmanned aircraft system on or above the grounds of a state prison, a jail, or a juvenile hall, camp, or ranch. Existing law provides a state or local public entity or employee with immunity as to any person engaging in hazardous recreational activity, as defined, and for damage to an unmanned aircraft while the local entity or employee is providing emergency services. Existing law defines "unmanned aircraft" and other terms for purposes of these provisions. Existing federal regulations, adopted and administered by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) , regulate the operation of unmanned aircraft and unmanned aircraft systems. Existing federal regulations generally preclude enforcement of these regulations by state or local entities, except in certain areas such as police use, and prohibiting use for voyeurism, following consultation with the FAA. This bill would, among other things, prohibit a state or local agency from adopting any law or regulation that bans the operation of an unmanned aircraft system. The bill would also authorize a local agency to adopt regulations to enforce FAA regulations regarding the operation of unmanned aircraft systems and would authorize local agencies to regulate the operation of unmanned aircraft and unmanned aircraft systems within their jurisdictions, as specified. The bill would also authorize a local agency to require an unmanned aircraft operator to provide proof of federal, state, or local registration to licensing or enforcement officials. The bill would authorize a local entity to designate a recreational operating area for unmanned aircraft operation. The bill would immunize a local entity that designates such a recreational are from liability for injury or damage associated with unmanned aircraft operation, if specified signage is posted. The bill would define terms for purposes of these provisions.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jun 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2019 Last action Jun 19, 2019
Floor votes · Assembly May 23, 2019

How they voted

72–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 74
May 23, 2019
D Democratic57
55 Yea 2
96% Yea
I Independent1
1 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican16
16 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
14
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Amendments
4
Jun 19, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1852.)
lower
May 1, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 30).
lower
Apr 29, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 25, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 24, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 23).
lower
Apr 22, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Mar 11, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and JUD.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Jacqui Irwin
Jacqui Irwin
DDemocratic
CA
42