Safe Drinking and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986: appeal: notice to the Attorney General.
Summary
The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, an initiative measure approved by the voters as Proposition 65 at the November 4, 1986, statewide general election, prohibits a person, in the course of doing business, from knowingly and intentionally exposing any individual to a chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity without giving a specified warning, or from knowingly discharging or releasing that chemical into water, or into or onto land and passing into any source of drinking water, except as specified. The act authorizes a person, acting in the public interest, to bring an action to enforce the requirements of the act if that person has given a notice of violation to the Attorney General, the district attorney and a city attorney or prosecutor in whose jurisdiction the violation is alleged to have occurred, and the alleged violator 60 days before the commencement of the action and neither the Attorney General nor a district attorney nor a city attorney or prosecutor has commenced and is diligently prosecuting an action against the alleged violator. This bill would require each party, in an appellate proceeding in which a violation of Proposition 65 is alleged or the application or construction of Proposition 65 is at issue, to serve a copy of the party's brief or petition and brief on the Attorney General, as provided. The bill would prohibit the acceptance for filing of a brief unless the proof of service shows service on the Attorney General. Proposition 65 provides that it may be amended by a statute, passed by a 23 vote of each house of the Legislature, to further its purposes. This bill would find and declare that it furthers the purposes of Proposition 65.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Aug 2019
Signed into Law
Aug 2019
Introduced Feb 21, 2019
Signed Aug 30, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Aug 19, 2019 · Assembly May 2, 2019
How they voted
28–9
Passed
Total votes 37
Aug 19, 2019
D
Democratic28
100% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Aug 30, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 19, 2019
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 19, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 11. Page 2202.).
upper
Jul 8, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 20, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on EQ. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
May 16, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and EQ.
upper
May 2, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 58. Noes 19. Page 1465.)
lower
Apr 24, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (April 24).
lower
Apr 2, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 27, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (March 26). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 7, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.S. & T.M. and JUD.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Eloise Reyes
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1123
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1123. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline