Foster care.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) program, under which counties provide payments to foster care providers on behalf of qualified children in foster care. In order to be eligible for AFDC-FC, existing law requires, in pertinent part, a child to be placed in one of several specified placements. Existing law sets forth the rights of a minor in foster care, including, among other rights, the right to be involved in the development of, and to review, their own case plan and plan for permanent placement. Prior to making a change in the placement of a dependent child, existing law requires a social worker or placing agency to develop and implement a placement preservation strategy to preserve the dependent child's placement. If a placement change is necessary, existing law requires the social worker or placing agency to serve written notice of that change on specified parties at least 14 days prior to the change. Existing law requires complaints under these provisions to be investigated by the Office of the State Foster Care Ombudsperson, and requires the office to provide the findings of an investigation to the county child welfare director or their designee. This bill would delete references to placing agencies, would extend the application of these provisions to probation-supervised youth in foster care placement, and make related changes. The bill would also require a social worker or probation officer to, among other things, develop with the caregiver a placement preservation strategy. The bill would also require a social worker or probation officer to notify specified parties at least 14 calendar days prior to a placement change if the social worker or probation officer reserves a placement change request from the caregiver or provider or otherwise finds that a foster care placement change is necessary. If a complaint is investigated by the office under these provisions, the bill would also require the office to provide the findings of the investigation to the chief probation officer or the chief probation officer's designee, as applicable. The bill would also exempt placement changes made under certain circumstances, including hospitalizations, from these provisions. By adding to the duties of probation officers, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Signed into Law
Oct 2019
Introduced Feb 21, 2019
Signed Oct 12, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2019 · Assembly May 22, 2019
How they voted
40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
Sep 9, 2019
D
Democratic29
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
14
Committee
9
Amendments
6
Oct 12, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3308.).
lower
Sep 9, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 9, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2701.).
upper
Sep 3, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Sep 3, 2019
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read third time, passed, and to Assembly.
upper
Aug 15, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 17 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 15, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2183.).
upper
Aug 12, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.
upper
Jul 2, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 29, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and PUB. S.
upper
May 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1824.)
lower
May 16, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (May 16).
lower
Apr 24, 2019
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 3, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 2, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 1, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 26).
lower
Mar 7, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Gipson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1061
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1061. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline