Firearms: reports to the Department of Justice.
Summary
Existing law generally requires firearms transactions to be processed through a licensed firearms dealer. Existing law generally requires firearms transactions that are exempt from the dealer requirement to be reported to the Department of Justice, either by mail or in person, or in a format prescribed by the department. This bill would, for various firearm transactions, as specified, instead allow the report to be made only by mail or via the California Firearms Application Reporting System (CFARS) , and would, for reports submitted by mail, allow the Department of Justice to charge the person making the report a surcharge, not to exceed $20, for the reasonable cost of receiving and processing the report. Existing law allows the Department of Justice to charge a specific fee sufficient to reimburse it for the actual processing costs associated with the submission of a Dealers' Record of Sale to the department. This bill would delete that authority. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 27920 of the Penal Code proposed by AB 1292 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1292 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 27966 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 376 to be operative only if this bill and SB 376 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 28230 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 376 to be operative only if this bill and SB 376 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jul 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Aug 2019
Vetoed
Oct 2019
Introduced Feb 21, 2019
Vetoed Oct 12, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Aug 19, 2019 · Assembly May 9, 2019
How they voted
33–3
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
Aug 19, 2019
D
Democratic29
100% Yea
R
Republican11
36% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Jan 21, 2020
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 12, 2019
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 61. Noes 3. Page 2798.).
lower
Aug 19, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 21 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 19, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 3. Page 2205.).
upper
Aug 13, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jul 8, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 25, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 22, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 9, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1590.)
lower
May 1, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (May 1).
lower
Apr 24, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 25, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 21, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jesse Gabriel
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1009
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1009. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline