A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by amending Section 25.5 of Article XIII thereof, relating to taxation.
Summary
The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose a local sales and use tax in accordance with that law for tangible personal property sold at retail in the county or city, or purchased for storage, use, or other consumption in the county or city. Existing law requires the city tax rate to be credited against the county rate so that the combined rate does not exceed 1.25%. Existing law requires the county or city to contract with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration for the administration of the taxes and requires the department to transmit those taxes to the city or county. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law provides that for the purpose of a local sales tax adopted pursuant to that law, all retail sales are consummated at the place of business of the retailer, unless otherwise specified. Existing law provides that these local sales taxes are allocated to the place where the sale is deemed to take place. The California Constitution prohibits the Legislature from enacting a statute that would change the method of distributing revenues derived under the Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law, as that law read on November 3, 2004, except the Legislature may change that law by statute to allow the state to participate in an interstate compact or to comply with federal law. This measure would provide that, on and after January 1, 2020, for the purpose of distributing the revenues derived under a sales tax imposed pursuant to the Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law, the retail sale of tangible personal property by a qualified retailer, as defined, that is transacted online is instead consummated at the point of the delivery of that tangible personal property to the purchaser's address or to any other delivery address designated by the purchaser.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2018
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Mar 22, 2018
Last action Aug 16, 2018
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Aug 16, 2018
Upper · Passed
August 16 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
May 24, 2018
Upper · Passed
May 25 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 15, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be adopted and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 5061.) (May 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 25, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be adopted and re-refer to Com. on E. & C.A. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4812.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Apr 12, 2018
Upper · Passed
April 18 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 4, 2018
Committee
Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F., E. & C.A., and APPR.
upper
Mar 22, 2018
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Steve Glazer
DDemocratic
Co
John M. W. Moorlach
RRepublican
Co
Scott Wiener
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SCA 20
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SCA 20. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline