Barbering and cosmetology.
Summary
Existing law, the Barbering and Cosmetology Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of the practice of barbering and cosmetology, which include, among other things, shampooing, arranging, dressing, curling, waving, and applying hair tonics to, the hair of any person, by the State Board of Barbering and Cosmetology. The act specifies that the practice of cosmetology also includes the practice of cleansing or beautifying the hair of any person and that the practice of barbering also includes the practice of hairstyling all textures of hair by standard methods that are current at the time of the hairstyling. The act makes it unlawful for any person to engage in barbering or cosmetology for compensation or to operate an establishment where barbering or cosmetology is practiced, without a license, and specifies that a violation of this requirement is subject to an administrative fine and may be subject to a misdemeanor. The act also makes it a misdemeanor, punishable as prescribed, for any person, firm, association or corporation to violate the act if no specific penalty is otherwise provided. This bill would remove the practices of shampooing, arranging, dressing, curling, and waving the hair of any person from the practice of barbering and cosmetology. The bill would remove the practice of hairstyling of all textures of hair by standard methods that are current at the time of the hairstyling from the practice of barbering. The bill would also remove the practice of cleansing or beautifying the hair of any person from the practice of cosmetology. The bill would require a person who engages in practices of arranging, beautifying, cleansing, curling, dressing, shampooing, or waving the hair of any person at an establishment to provide notice to consumers of his or her licensure status. Because the bill would create a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Jun 2018
Senate Passage
May 2018
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 5, 2018
Last action Jun 26, 2018
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2018
How they voted
26–2
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 31
May 31, 2018
D
Democratic21
76% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Jun 26, 2018
Committee
June 26 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 3. Noes 14.)
lower
Jun 7, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
May 31, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-2-3)
senate
May 25, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4301.) (May 25).
upper
May 3, 2018
Upper · Passed
May 7 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 19, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 18, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 4696.) (April 16).
upper
Feb 14, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Feb 5, 2018
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Morrell
RRepublican
Co
Kevin Kiley
RRepublican
Co
Richard Roth
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 999
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 999. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline