Mediation: confidentiality: disclosure.
Summary
Under existing law, if a person consults a mediator or consulting service for the purpose of retaining mediation services, or if persons agree to conduct and participate in a mediation for the purpose of compromising, settling, or resolving a civil dispute, anything said in the course of a mediation consultation or in the course of the mediation is not admissible in evidence nor subject to discovery, and all communications, negotiations, and settlement discussions by and between participants or mediators are confidential, except as specified. This bill would, except in the case of a class or representative action, require an attorney representing a person participating in a mediation or a mediation consultation to provide his or her client, as soon as reasonably possible before the client agrees to participate in the mediation or mediation consultation, with a printed disclosure, as specified, containing the confidentiality restrictions related to mediation, and to obtain a printed acknowledgment signed by that client stating that he or she has read and understands the confidentiality restrictions. If an attorney is retained after an individual agrees to participate in a mediation or mediation consultation, the bill would require the attorney to comply with the printed disclosure and acknowledgment requirements as soon as reasonably possible after being retained. The bill would specify language that would be deemed compliant with the aforementioned printed disclosure and acknowledgment requirements. The bill would also provide that the failure of an attorney to comply with these disclosure requirements does not invalidate an agreement prepared in the course of, or pursuant to, a mediation. The bill would further provide that a communication, document, or writing related to an attorney's compliance with the disclosure requirements is not confidential and may be used in an attorney disciplinary proceeding if the communication, document, or writing does not disclose anything said or done or any admission made in the course of the mediation.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Senate Passage
May 2018
Assembly Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Jan 30, 2018
Signed Sep 11, 2018
Floor votes · Senate May 17, 2018 · Assembly Aug 20, 2018
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
May 17, 2018
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Sep 11, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 21, 2018
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 5547.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 21, 2018
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 20, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (76-0-1)
assembly
Aug 16, 2018
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Jul 3, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 3).
lower
May 25, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 17, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-1)
senate
May 9, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4997.) (May 8).
upper
Apr 24, 2018
Upper · Passed
May 1 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 8, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 30, 2018
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 954
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 954. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline