Solid waste: disposal.
Summary
The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, administered by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, generally regulates the disposal, management, and recycling of solid waste. The act authorizes each county, city, district, or other local governmental agency to determine whether aspects of solid waste handling services are to be provided by franchise, contract, license, permit, or other authorization. This bill would require a court to award to a prevailing party reasonable attorney's fees, expert witness fees, and other costs incurred in a civil action brought to enforce a franchise, contract, license, permit, or other authorization for solid waste handling services in an amount the court deems appropriate, but would prohibit the court from awarding those fees and costs under specified circumstances. The bill would require a plaintiff, in order for a court to award to a prevailing party those costs and fees, to first notify and request approval to proceed from the relevant local agency. The bill would require the local agency to post all notices and approval requests it receives on the local agency's Internet Web site, as specified. By imposing additional duties on local agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require a person seeking costs and fees in accordance with that provision to notify the department, and would require the department to report to the Legislature the total number and dispositions of actions filed in accordance with that provision for the previous calendar year. The bill would repeal these provisions as of January 1, 2022. The act prohibits a person, other than an authorized recycling agent, from removing specified materials that have been segregated from solid waste materials and placed at a designated recycling collection location for residential curbside collection programs authorized by a city, county, or local agency for the purposes of collection and recycling or at a designated recycling collection location by any commercial or industrial entity. Existing law authorizes a court, in a civil action by a recycling agent against a person alleged to have violated these laws, to either allow treble damages or award a civil penalty, as specified, against the unauthorized person removing the recyclable material, and to allow treble damages or award a higher civil penalty, as specified, against a person for a second violation and subsequent violations. This bill would expand this civil enforcement to apply to knowing and willful participation in the unauthorized removal of the segregated recyclable material, would explicitly authorize a local governmental agency to bring an enforcement action, and would require a court to award to the prevailing party reasonable attorney's fees, expert witness fees, and costs incurred in the course of the litigation, except as specified. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2017
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Senate Passage
May 2017
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 9, 2017
Last action Aug 16, 2018
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
12
Committee
14
Amendments
3
Aug 16, 2018
Lower · Passed
August 16 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 7, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
lower
Jul 5, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 3).
lower
Jun 27, 2018
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 26, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 25).
lower
Jun 11, 2018
Lower · Passed
June 11 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 18, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Be re-referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 5, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jul 5, 2017
Lower · Passed
July 5 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 12, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on U. & E. and H. & C.D.
lower
May 25, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1177.) (May 25).
upper
May 16, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 15, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3. Page 1021.) (May 9).
upper
Apr 18, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Apr 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on T. & H. (Ayes 8. Noes 3. Page 621.) (April 4).
upper
Mar 8, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on E., U. & C., T. & H., and APPR.
upper
Jan 19, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 9, 2017
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Scott Wiener
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 71
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 71. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline