SB 666 California Senate · 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Gambling Control Commission and Department of Justice: postemployment restrictions.

Summary
Existing law, the Gambling Control Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of various legalized gambling activities and establishments by the California Gambling Control Commission and the investigation and enforcement of those activities and establishments by the Department of Justice. The act specifies qualifications for eligibility as a member of the commission and provides that a person is ineligible for appointment if, within 2 years prior to appointment, the person was employed by, retained by, or derived substantial income from, a gambling establishment. The act prohibits a member of the commission, the executive director, the chief, and any employee of the commission or department designated by regulation, for a period of 3 years after leaving office or terminating employment, for compensation, from acting as agent or attorney for any other person before the commission or the department if the appearance or communication is for the purpose of influencing administrative action, as specified. A person who willfully violates any provision of the act for which a penalty is not expressly provided is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would additionally prohibit a member of the commission, the executive director, the chief, any employee of the commission, and any employee of the department who works on or supervises over gambling issues for a period of 2 years after leaving office or terminating employment, from holding a direct or indirect interest in, holding employment with, representing, appearing for, or negotiating on behalf of, a gambling establishment, gambling enterprise, registrant, or licensee. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Jul 2017
Senate Passage
May 2017
Assembly Passage
Aug 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Feb 17, 2017 Signed Sep 11, 2017
Floor votes · Assembly Aug 24, 2017

How they voted

700
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 73
Aug 24, 2017
D Democratic51
49 Yea 2
96% Yea
I Independent1
1 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican21
20 Yea 1
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
26
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Sep 11, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 24, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-3)
assembly
Jul 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 19).
lower
Jul 6, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 21. Noes 0.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 12, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
May 8, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 3, 2017
Upper · Passed
May 8 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 25, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 827.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 29, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Mar 9, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 17, 2017
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Andy Vidak
Andy Vidak
RRepublican
CA
14