SB 658 California Senate · 2017-2018 Regular Session

Jury selection.

Summary
The Trial Jury Selection and Management Act, among other things, requires a trial judge to examine the prospective jurors in civil jury trials. The act gives the counsel for each party, after this initial examination, the right to examine any of the prospective jurors, as specified, in order to enable counsel to intelligently exercise both peremptory challenges and challenges for cause. The act prohibits a court from arbitrarily or unreasonably refusing to submit a reasonable written questionnaire to the jury if requested by counsel and states that the parties should be provided reasonable time to evaluate the responses to the questionnaire, if utilized, before oral questioning commences. The act states that the trial judge should consider, among other criteria, any unique or complex elements in the case when exercising his or her discretion as to the form and subject matter of voir dire questions. This bill would require that the parties be provided reasonable time to evaluate the responses to a questionnaire, if utilized, before oral questioning commences. The bill would authorize the parties to submit questions to the trial judge before he or she conducts voir dire and authorize the judge to include these questions if he or she deems them proper. The bill would modify the scope of questioning allowed by the parties, require a trial judge to consider specific factors in conducting voir dire, and prohibit the judge from establishing an inflexible time limit policy for voir dire. The bill would also require a judge in civil trials to, at the earliest practical time, provide the parties with both the alphabetical list and the list of prospective jurors in the order in which they will be called.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Senate Passage
May 2017
Assembly Passage
Aug 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Feb 17, 2017 Signed Sep 27, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 6, 2017 · Assembly Aug 31, 2017

How they voted

40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
Sep 6, 2017
D Democratic27
27 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican13
13 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
28
Key actions
6
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Sep 27, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 6, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (40-0)
senate
Sep 5, 2017
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2480.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 31, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-7)
assembly
Aug 31, 2017
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 18).
lower
Jun 1, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 8, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 946.) (May 2).
upper
Mar 29, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 9, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 17, 2017
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors