Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency.
Summary
Existing law, the Castaic Lake Water Agency Law, created the Castaic Lake Water Agency and authorizes the agency to acquire water and water rights, including water from the State Water Project, and to provide, sell, and deliver water at wholesale for municipal, industrial, domestic, and other purposes. This bill would repeal the Castaic Lake Water Agency Law. Existing law, the County Water District Law, authorizes the formation of county water districts and authorizes those districts to appropriate, acquire, and conserve water and water rights for any useful purpose and to operate water rights, works, properties, rights, and privileges useful or necessary to convey, supply, store, or make use of water for any purpose authorized by that law. This bill would reorganize the Newhall County Water District and the Castaic Lake Water Agency into the Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency, which this bill would create, and prohibit the Castaic Lake Water Agency and the Newhall County Water District from operating as separate entities or exercising independent functions. The bill would generally specify the powers and purposes, as well as the boundaries, of the Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency and would provide that the purpose of the agency is to provide, sell, manage, and deliver surface water, groundwater, and recycled water at retail or wholesale within the agency's territory. The bill would prescribe the composition of the board of directors of the agency. Existing law authorizes the Castaic Lake Water Agency to prescribe methods for the construction of works and for the letting of contracts for the construction of works, structures, or equipment, or the performance or furnishing of labor, materials, or supplies, for carrying out specified provisions. Existing law requires all contracts for any improvement or unit of work when the cost estimate exceeds $5,000 to be let to the lowest responsible bidder or bidders. Existing law authorizes the agency to have work done by force account without advertising for bids and to purchase in the open market materials and supplies when the estimated cost of the work or the cost of the materials and supplies does not exceed $5,000. This bill would instead make these provisions applicable to the Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency and would increase these cost and cost estimate limits to $30,000. Existing law requires, for any proposal involving the dissolution of the Newhall County Water District, that the local agency formation commission forward the change of organization or reorganization for confirmation by the voters if the commission finds that a petition requesting that the proposal be submitted for confirmation by the voters has been signed, as prescribed. This bill would repeal that provision. Existing law, the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (act) , provides the sole and exclusive authority and procedure for the initiation, conduct, and completion of changes of organization and reorganization for cities and districts. This bill would require the agency to submit an application for conditions addressing the creation of the agency to the Local Agency Formation Commission for the County of Los Angeles, as specified, and require the commission to prepare a written report, which may contain specific conditions to which the agency would be subject and which the commission deems appropriate under the act. The bill would require the agency to reimburse the Local Agency Formation Commission for the County of Los Angeles for all costs associated with the submittal, review, consideration, preparation, and determination associated with the application for conditions and the preparation of the written report. By imposing duties on the agency and a county in connection with the operation of the agency, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Senate Passage
May 2017
Assembly Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 17, 2017
Signed Oct 15, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 15, 2017 · Assembly Sep 13, 2017
How they voted
34–1
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 40
Sep 15, 2017
D
Democratic27
77% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
41
Key actions
15
Committee
10
Amendments
5
Oct 15, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 15, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-1-5)
senate
Sep 14, 2017
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 34. Noes 1. Page 2929.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 14, 2017
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 13, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (59-13-4)
assembly
Sep 8, 2017
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Sep 1, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (September 1).
lower
Jul 12, 2017
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 11, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 2.) (July 11).
lower
Jun 29, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on W.,P., & W. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on W.,P., & W.
lower
Jun 15, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and W.,P., & W.
lower
May 26, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
May 25, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1188.) (May 25).
upper
May 2, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 884.) (April 26).
upper
Apr 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
April 19 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 28). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 17, 2017
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Scott Wilk
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 634
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 634. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline