SB 63 California Senate · 2017-2018 Regular Session

Unlawful employment practice: parental leave.

Summary
Existing law, the Moore-Brown-Roberti Family Rights Act, or California Family Rights Act (CFRA) , makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer, as defined, to refuse to grant a request by an eligible employee to take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid protected leave during any 12-month period (1) for reason of a child born to, adopted by, or placed for foster care with, the employee, (2) to care for the employee's parent or spouse who has a serious health condition, as defined, or (3) because the employee is suffering from a serious health condition rendering him or her unable to perform the functions of the job. Existing law prohibits an employer from refusing to allow a female employee disabled by pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition to take a leave for a reasonable time of up to 4 months before returning to work. Existing law also prohibits an employer from refusing to maintain and pay for coverage under a group health plan for an employee who takes that leave, as specified. This bill would prohibit an employer, as defined, from refusing to allow an employee with more than 12 months of service with the employer, who has at least 1,250 hours of service with the employer during the previous 12-month period, and who works at a worksite in which the employer employs at least 20 employees within 75 miles, to take up to 12 weeks of parental leave to bond with a new child within one year of the child's birth, adoption, or foster care placement. The bill would also prohibit an employer from refusing to maintain and pay for coverage under a group health plan for an employee who takes this leave. The bill would allow the employer to recover coverage costs under specific circumstances. The bill would provide that it would not apply to an employee who is subject to both specified state law regarding family care and medical leave, and the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. Under the bill, if the employer employs both parents and they are entitled to leave pursuant to this bill for the same birth, adoption, or foster care placement, the parents' mandated parental leave would be capped at the amount granted to an employee by the bill. The bill would authorize the employer to grant simultaneous leave to these parents. This bill would also prohibit an employer from refusing to hire, or from discharging, fining, suspending, expelling, or discriminating against, an individual for exercising the right to parental leave provided by this bill or giving information or testimony as to his or her own parental leave, or another person's parental leave, in an inquiry or proceeding related to rights guaranteed under this bill. The bill would additionally prohibit an employer from interfering with, restraining, or denying the exercise of, or the attempt to exercise, any right provided under this bill. The bill would require the Fair Employment and Housing Council, to the extent that state regulations interpreting CFRA are within the scope of, and not inconsistent with the bill or with other state law, to incorporate those regulations by reference to govern leave under the bill. Under existing law, the Department of Fair Employment and Housing is authorized to provide mediation services to parties involved in actions under its jurisdiction. This bill, until January 1, 2020, would require the Department of Fair Employment and Housing, upon receiving funding from the Legislature, to create a parental leave mediation pilot program, as specified. Under the pilot program, within 60 days of receipt of a right-to-sue notice, an employer may request all parties to participate in the department's Mediation Division Program. If the employer makes such a request, the bill would prohibit an employee from pursuing any civil action under these provisions until the mediation is complete, as defined, which would include an employee's election not to participate in mediation. The bill would provide that the employee's statute of limitations would be tolled during the course of the mediation, as specified.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2016
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Senate Passage
May 2017
Assembly Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Dec 22, 2016 Signed Oct 12, 2017
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2017 · Assembly Sep 12, 2017

How they voted

2010
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 32
May 30, 2017
D Democratic22
20 Yea 1 Nay 1
90% Yea
R Republican10
9 Nay 1
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
35
Key actions
13
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Oct 12, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 13, 2017
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 2843.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 13, 2017
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 12, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-14-11)
assembly
Sep 8, 2017
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Sep 1, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 6.) (September 1).
lower
Jun 28, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 22, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 8, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & E. and JUD.
lower
May 30, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-10-2)
senate
May 25, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1177.) (May 25).
upper
Apr 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 6, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 625.) (April 4).
upper
Mar 23, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 22, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 445.) (March 22).
upper
Jan 12, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and JUD.
upper
Dec 22, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 9 co-sponsors

Sponsors