Tribal gaming: compact ratification.
Summary
Existing federal law, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, provides for the negotiation and execution of tribal-state gaming compacts for the purpose of authorizing certain types of gaming on Indian lands within a state. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to negotiate and conclude tribal-state gaming compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature. Existing law expressly ratifies a number of tribal-state gaming compacts, and amendments of tribal-state gaming compacts, between the State of California and specified Indian tribes. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. This bill would ratify the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and the Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians, executed on August 18, 2017. The bill would provide that, in deference to tribal sovereignty, certain actions related to that compact are not projects for purposes of CEQA. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 17, 2017
Signed Oct 3, 2017
Floor votes · Senate May 1, 2017 · Assembly Sep 14, 2017
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 1, 2017
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Oct 3, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 15, 2017
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2997.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 15, 2017
Upper · Passed
Urgency clause adopted.
upper
Sep 15, 2017
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 14, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0)
assembly
Sep 7, 2017
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Jun 22, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 21).
lower
May 22, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
May 1, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Apr 20, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 783.) (April 19).
upper
Mar 30, 2017
Upper · Passed
April 5 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 17, 2017
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike McGuire
DDemocratic
Co
Cristina Garcia
DDemocratic
Co
JW
Jim Wood
DDemocratic
Co
TM
Tony Mendoza
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 585
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 585. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline