Custodial interrogation: juveniles.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a peace officer to take a minor into temporary custody when that officer has reasonable cause to believe that the minor has committed a crime or violated an order of the juvenile court. In these circumstances, existing law requires the peace officer to advise the minor that anything he or she says can be used against him or her, that he or she has the right to remain silent, that he or she has the right to have counsel present during any interrogation, and that he or she has the right to have counsel appointed if he or she is unable to afford counsel. This bill would require that a youth 15 years of age or younger consult with legal counsel in person, by telephone, or by video conference prior to a custodial interrogation and before waiving any of the above-specified rights. The bill would prohibit a waiver of the consultation. The bill would require the court to consider the effect of the failure to comply with the above-specified requirement in adjudicating the admissibility of statements of a youth 15 years of age or younger made during or after a custodial interrogation. The bill would clarify that these provisions do not apply to the admissibility of statements of a youth 15 years of age or younger if certain criteria are met. This bill would require the Governor, or his or designee, to convene a panel of at least 7 experts, as specified, no later than January 1, 2023. The bill would require the panel to review, and to examine the effects and outcomes related to, the implementation of the above-described requirements, as specified, and to provide, no later than April 1, 2024, certain information to the Legislature and the Governor. This bill would repeal these requirements on January 1, 2025.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Senate Passage
May 2017
Assembly Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 15, 2017
Signed Oct 11, 2017
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Oct 11, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 15, 2017
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 9. Page 2996.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 15, 2017
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 7, 2017
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Jun 27, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 27).
lower
Jun 8, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 25, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1184.) (May 25).
upper
Mar 29, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 27, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 22, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 430.) (March 21).
upper
Feb 23, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 15, 2017
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 395
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 395. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline