Trusts: modification or termination.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the beneficiaries of an irrevocable trust, upon the consent of all beneficiaries, to compel the modification or termination of the trust upon petition to the court. Existing law prohibits the modification or termination of an irrevocable trust if the continuance of the trust is necessary to carry out a material purpose of the trust, unless the court determines that modification or termination under the circumstances outweighs the interest in accomplishing a material purpose of the trust. Notwithstanding that provision, existing law prohibits the court from terminating a trust that is subject to a valid restraint on the transfer of a beneficiary's interest. This bill would revise and recast these provisions to delete the provision prohibiting a court from terminating an irrevocable trust that is subject to a valid restraint on the transfer of a beneficiary's interest and instead authorize the court to terminate a trust with this restraint if the court finds good cause to do so. The bill would specify that a court is authorized to limit the class of beneficiaries whose consent is necessary to modify or terminate a trust when the class is described as "heirs" or "next of kin." The bill would also make clarifying changes. Existing law authorizes the settlor and the beneficiaries of a trust, upon the consent of the settlor and all beneficiaries, to compel the modification or termination of the trust. This bill would revise and recast those provisions and instead authorize the trust to be modified or terminated by the written consent of the settlor and all beneficiaries without court approval of the modification or termination. The bill would also make clarifying changes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Jun 2017
Senate Passage
Apr 2017
Assembly Passage
Jun 2017
Signed into Law
Jul 2017
Introduced Feb 13, 2017
Signed Jul 10, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Jun 22, 2017 · Assembly Jun 19, 2017
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 32
Jun 22, 2017
D
Democratic22
95% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Jul 10, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 22, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-1)
senate
Jun 22, 2017
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1679.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jun 19, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-4)
assembly
Jun 19, 2017
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 13, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 13).
lower
May 18, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 5, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 626.) (April 4).
upper
Feb 23, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 13, 2017
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joel Anderson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 333
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 333. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline