Public officers: custodial officers.
Summary
Existing law defines who is a peace officer and specifies the powers of peace officers. Existing law specifies that a custodial officer is a public officer, not a peace officer, employed by a law enforcement agency of a city or county who has the authority and responsibility for maintaining custody of prisoners and performs tasks related to the operation of a local detention facility used for the detention of persons usually pending arraignment or upon court order, as specified. Existing law provides that a custodial officer does not have the right to carry or possess firearms in the performance of his or her prescribed duties. Existing law also describes the powers and duties of custodial officers. This bill would limit the scope of the prohibition against carrying or possessing firearms by authorizing a custodial officer to use a firearm that is a less lethal weapon, as defined, in the performance of his or her official duties, at the discretion of the employing sheriff or chief of police, as applicable, or his or her designee. The bill would require that a custodial officer who uses a less lethal weapon be trained in its use and comply with the policy on the use of less lethal weapons as set forth by the sheriff. The bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes to the provisions relating to custodial officers.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Jun 2017
Senate Passage
Apr 2017
Assembly Passage
Jun 2017
Signed into Law
Jul 2017
Introduced Feb 13, 2017
Signed Jul 17, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Jun 29, 2017
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
Jun 29, 2017
D
Democratic27
92% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Jul 17, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 29, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-4)
senate
Jun 29, 2017
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 1801.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jun 19, 2017
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 13, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 13).
lower
May 22, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 19, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 748.) (April 18).
upper
Apr 5, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 23, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 13, 2017
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Roth
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 324
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 324. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline