California State University: personal services contracts.
Summary
Existing law, the State Civil Service Act, establishes standards for the use of personal services contracts by state agencies. The act provides that personal services contracting is permissible to achieve cost savings when certain conditions are met, including, but not limited to, that the contracting agency demonstrates that the proposed contract will result in actual overall cost savings to the state and that the contract will not cause the displacement of civil service employees. The act also authorizes state agencies to enter into personal services contracts for functions exempted from civil service. The California Constitution excludes the officers and employees of the California State University from the state civil service. Existing law authorizes the Trustees of the California State University to enter into agreements with any public or private agency, person, or institution for the furnishing of services, facilities, goods, supplies, or equipment, among others, and requires the trustees to prescribe policies and procedures for the acquisition of those services, facilities, materials, goods, supplies, or equipment. This bill would establish standards for the use of personal services contracts by the trustees similar to those in the State Civil Service Act for services that are currently or customarily performed by employees of the university.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Senate Passage
Jun 2017
Assembly Passage
Sep 2017
Vetoed
Mar 2018
Introduced Feb 13, 2017
Vetoed Mar 3, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Sep 14, 2017 · Assembly Sep 13, 2017
How they voted
26–11
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Sep 14, 2017
D
Democratic27
96% Yea
R
Republican13
76% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Mar 3, 2018
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governor’s veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
upper
Oct 12, 2017
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 12, 2017
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 14, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-11-3)
senate
Sep 14, 2017
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 26. Noes 11. Page 2886.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 14, 2017
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 13, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (46-23-7)
assembly
Sep 1, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (September 1).
lower
Jul 12, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) (July 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 15, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
May 25, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1182.) (May 25).
upper
Apr 5, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 620.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 23, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 13, 2017
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 318
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 318. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline