California Religious Freedom Act: state agencies: disclosure of religious affiliation information.
Summary
Existing law prohibits a state agency from including a question regarding an applicant's race, sex, marital status, or religion in any application form for employment. This bill would prohibit a state or local agency or a public employee acting under color of law from providing or disclosing to the federal government personal information regarding a person's religious beliefs, practices, or affiliation, as specified, when the information is sought for compiling a database of individuals based on religious belief, practice, or affiliation, national origin, or ethnicity for law enforcement or immigration purposes. The bill would also prohibit a state agency from using agency resources to assist with any government program compiling such a database, or from making state databases available in connection with an investigation or enforcement under such a program. The bill would prohibit state and local law enforcement agencies and their employees from collecting personal information on the religious beliefs, practices, or affiliation of any individual, except as part of a targeted investigation, as provided, or where necessary to provide religious accommodations. The bill would also prohibit law enforcement agencies from using agency or department moneys, facilities, property, equipment, or personnel to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of any criminal, civil, or administrative violation, or warrant for a violation, of any requirement that individuals register with the federal government or any federal agency based on religion, national origin, or ethnicity. The bill would also terminate, to the extent of any conflict, any existing agreements that make any agency or department information or database available in conflict with these provisions. The bill would not prevent the collection, retention, or disclosure of personal information or documents as required by Federal law or a court order. The bill would provide that an agency or employee would only be deemed to be in violation of its provisions if the agency or employee acted with actual knowledge that the information shared would be used for purposes prohibited by these provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2016
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Senate Passage
Apr 2017
Assembly Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Dec 5, 2016
Signed Oct 15, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Apr 4, 2017 · Assembly Sep 15, 2017
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 32
Apr 4, 2017
D
Democratic22
100% Yea
R
Republican10
70% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
11
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Oct 15, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 15, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-2-1)
assembly
Sep 15, 2017
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 3000.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 15, 2017
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 8, 2017
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Sep 1, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (September 1).
lower
Jun 13, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 18, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 4, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-3)
senate
Mar 27, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
Mar 13, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 348.) (March 13).
upper
Mar 2, 2017
Upper · Passed
March 6 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jan 31, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 130.) (January 31). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 12, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Dec 5, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 14 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ricardo Lara
DDemocratic
Co
Bill Dodd
DDemocratic
Co
Bill Monning
DDemocratic
Co
Cristina Garcia
DDemocratic
Co
David Chiu
DDemocratic
Co
James Gallagher
RRepublican
Co
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Co
Joel Anderson
RRepublican
Co
Marc Levine
DDemocratic
Co
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Co
Patrick O'Donnell
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 31
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 31. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline