Enforcement of money judgments: exemptions.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a judgment creditor to levy upon the property of a judgment debtor to satisfy a judgment, and authorizes the judgment debtor to claim that certain property is exempt from the levy by following a specified procedure. Existing law authorizes a claimant to assert an exemption by filing a claim of exemption with the levying officer within 10 days after the date the notice of levy on the property claimed to be exempt is served on the judgment debtor. This bill would authorize a claimant to file a claim of exemption with the levying officer either in person or by mail and would specify that the period for filing the claim is 15 days if the judgment debtor is personally served with a notice of levy on the property claimed to be exempt, and 20 days if the claimant is served with notice by mail. The bill would deem the filing by mail complete on the date the claim is postmarked if the mailing is assigned a tracking number. If the mailing is not assigned a tracking number, the bill would deem the filing by mail complete on the date the claim is received by the levying officer. With certain enumerated exceptions, this bill would exempt from a levy money in a judgment debtor's deposit account in an amount equal to or less than $1,200. The bill would require a levy against a judgment debtor's deposit account to include a description of these requirements. This bill would require the Judicial Council to amend or adopt necessary forms. This bill would also require the Judicial Council to, every 3 years, adjust the amount of the exemption described above based on the change in the annual California Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, as specified, and it would make additional conforming changes. These provisions of the bill would become operative on September 1, 2019.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Senate Passage
May 2017
Assembly Failed
Aug 2018
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2017
Last action Aug 30, 2018
Floor votes · Assembly Aug 31, 2018
How they voted
25–28
Failed · 20 other
Total votes 73
Aug 31, 2018
D
Democratic51
49% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican21
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Aug 31, 2018
Vote failed
Assembly Vote: fail (25-28-20)
assembly
Aug 24, 2018
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 15, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 15).
lower
Jun 25, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
lower
Jun 21, 2018
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Sep 8, 2017
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Jun 28, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 27).
lower
Jun 15, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 8, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 945.) (May 2).
upper
Mar 29, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 23, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 13, 2017
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 298
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 298. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline