Pupil meals: Child Hunger Prevention and Fair Treatment Act of 2017.
Summary
Existing law requires each school district or county superintendent of schools maintaining kindergarten or any of grades 1 to 12, inclusive, to provide one nutritionally adequate free or reduced-price meal for each needy pupil during each schoolday, except as specified. Existing law authorizes a school district or county office of education to use funds made available through any applicable federal or state program or to use its own funds to provide the required meals. This bill would enact the Child Hunger Prevention and Fair Treatment Act of 2017. The act would require certain local educational agencies, as defined, that provide school meals through the federal National School Lunch Program or the federal School Breakfast Program to ensure that a pupil whose parent or guardian has unpaid school meal fees is not shamed, treated differently, or served a meal that differs from what a pupil whose parent or guardian does not have unpaid school meal fees would receive under that local educational agency's policy. The act would prohibit school personnel and volunteers at a local educational agency that serves nutritionally adequate meals to pupils during the instructional day from allowing any disciplinary action that is taken against a pupil to result in the denial or delay of a nutritionally adequate meal to that pupil. The act would require a local educational agency to notify a parent or guardian of the negative balance of a pupil's school meal account no later than 10 days after the pupil's school meal account has reached a negative balance. The act would require a local educational agency, before sending this notification to the parent or guardian, to exhaust all options and methods to directly certify the pupil for free or reduced-price meals. The act would require a local educational agency to reimburse school meal fees paid by a pupil's parent or guardian when fees were paid or unpaid fees debt accrued when a pupil would have been determined to be eligible for free or reduced-price school meals. To the extent that these provisions would place additional requirements on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Senate Passage
May 2017
Assembly Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 7, 2017
Signed Oct 12, 2017
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2017 · Assembly Sep 13, 2017
How they voted
32–0
Passed
Total votes 32
May 31, 2017
D
Democratic22
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
10
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Oct 12, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 14, 2017
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2884.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 14, 2017
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 13, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-2)
assembly
Sep 1, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (September 1).
lower
Jun 29, 2017
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 28, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 21).
lower
Jun 12, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
May 31, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0)
senate
May 25, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1180.) (May 25).
upper
Mar 22, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 21, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 370.) (March 15).
upper
Feb 16, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 7, 2017
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 10 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Robert M. Hertzberg
DDemocratic
Co
Andy Vidak
RRepublican
Co
Cathleen Galgiani
DDemocratic
Co
Cristina Garcia
DDemocratic
Co
Kansen Chu
DDemocratic
Co
Kevin McCarty
DDemocratic
Co
Randy Voepel
RRepublican
Co
Reggie Jones-Sawyer
DDemocratic
Co
Scott Wilk
RRepublican
Co
Steve Bradford
DDemocratic
Co
TG
Todd Gloria
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 250
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 250. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline