Political Reform Act of 1974: slate mailers.
Summary
The Political Reform Act of 1974 regulates a type of mass mailings, known as slate mailers, that support or oppose multiple candidates or ballot measures for an election. The act requires a slate mailer organization that displays a logo, insignia, emblem, or trademark that is identical or substantially similar to that of a governmental agency or specified nongovernmental organization to obtain express written permission to do so. The act requires a slate mailer organization that sends a slate mailer or other mass mailing that identifies itself or its source material as representing a nongovernmental organization with a name that would reasonably be understood to imply that the nongovernmental organization is composed of, or affiliated with, law enforcement, firefighting, emergency medical, or other public safety personnel, to disclose in the slate mailer or mass mailing the total number of members in the organization identified in the slate mailer or mass mailing. This bill, with regard to this latter category of slate mailers and mass mailings, would require the slate mailer organization to disclose on the mailing, in a specified format, whether the slate mailer organization represents public safety personnel. Existing law makes a knowing or willful violation of the act a misdemeanor and subjects offenders to criminal penalties. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating additional crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house of the Legislature and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Aug 2017
Senate Passage
May 2017
Assembly Passage
Jul 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 2, 2017
Signed Oct 15, 2017
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Oct 15, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 21, 2017
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 35. Noes 3. Page 2170.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jul 18, 2017
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 28, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (June 28).
lower
Jun 15, 2017
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 14).
lower
May 22, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
May 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 19, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 743.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 23, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Feb 16, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 2, 2017
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Robert M. Hertzberg
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 226
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 226. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline