Residential density and affordability.
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Law requires a city, county, or city and county to ensure that its housing element inventory, as described, can accommodate its share of the regional housing need throughout the planning period. The law also prohibits a city, county, or city and county from reducing, requiring, or permitting the reduction of the residential density to a lower residential density that is below the density that was utilized by the Department of Housing and Community Development in determining compliance with housing element law, unless the city, county, or city and county makes written findings supported by substantial evidence that the reduction is consistent with the adopted general plan, including the housing element, and that the remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing need. The city, county, or city and county may reduce the residential density for a parcel if it identifies sufficient sites, as prescribed, so that there is no net loss of residential unit capacity. This bill, among other things, would prohibit a city, county, or city and county from permitting or causing its inventory of sites identified in the housing element to be insufficient to meet its remaining unmet share of the regional housing need for lower and moderate-income households. The bill also would expand the definition of "lower residential density" if the local jurisdiction has not adopted a housing element for the current planning period or the adopted housing element is not in substantial compliance, as specified. The bill would additionally require a city, county, or city and county to make specified written findings if the city, county, or city and county allows development of any parcel with fewer units by income category than identified in the housing element for that parcel. Where the approval of a development project results in fewer units by income category than identified in the housing element for that parcel and the remaining sites in the housing element are not adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing need by income level, the bill would require the jurisdiction within 180 days to identify and make available additional adequate sites. The bill would provide that an action that creates an obligation to identify or make available additional adequate sites and the action to identify or make available those sites would not create an obligation under the California Environmental Quality Act to identify, analyze, or mitigate the environmental impacts of that subsequent action, as specified. By increasing the duties of local agencies, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Senate Passage
Jun 2017
Assembly Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Jan 23, 2017
Signed Sep 29, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2017 · Assembly Sep 15, 2017
How they voted
23–9
Passed
Total votes 32
Jun 1, 2017
D
Democratic22
100% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Sep 29, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 15, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (46-22-1)
assembly
Sep 15, 2017
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 24. Noes 11. Page 2959.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 15, 2017
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 12, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 12). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
lower
Jun 29, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
Jun 15, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and H. & C.D.
lower
Jun 1, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-9)
senate
May 15, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 2, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 884.) (April 26).
upper
Mar 8, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 9. Noes 1. Page 327.) (March 7). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on T. & H. and GOV. & F.
upper
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 23, 2017
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 166
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 166. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline