Wage garnishment restrictions: exempt earnings: student loans.
Summary
The Wage Garnishment Law prescribes the procedure for withholding an employee's earnings for purposes of paying a debt. The law requires that a levy of execution upon the earnings of an employee be made by service of an earnings withholding order upon the employer. An earnings withholding order is issued by a levying officer upon receiving an application submitted by a judgment creditor. An employer is required, except as specified, to withhold the amounts required by an earnings withholding order from all earnings of the employee payable for any pay period of the employee which ends during the withholding period. The law prohibits the amount of an individual judgment debtor's weekly disposable earnings subject to levy under an earnings withholding order from exceeding the lesser of 25% of the individual's weekly disposable earnings or 50% of the amount by which the individual's disposable earnings for the week exceed 40 times the state minimum hourly wage, or applicable local minimum hourly wage, if higher, in effect at the time the earnings are payable. This bill would establish a reduced maximum amount of disposable earnings of an individual judgment debtor subject to levy under an earnings withholding order for a judgment based in whole or in part on a claim for debt on a student loan that is not made, insured, or guaranteed by the United States Government pursuant to the Federal Family Education Loan Program or the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program. The bill would prohibit the amount of disposable earnings subject to levy from exceeding the lesser of 15% of the individual's disposable earnings for that week or 50% of the amount by which the individual's disposable earnings for the week exceed 40 times the state minimum hourly wage, or applicable local minimum hourly wage, if higher, in effect at the time the earnings are payable.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2016
Committee Review
Jun 2017
Senate Passage
Apr 2017
Assembly Failed
Jun 2017
Governor
Introduced Dec 5, 2016
Last action Jun 29, 2017
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 29, 2017
How they voted
36–22
Failed · 12 other
Total votes 70
Jun 29, 2017
D
Democratic48
75% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican21
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
2
Committee
4
Jun 29, 2017
Vote failed
Assembly Vote: fail (36-22-12)
assembly
Jun 13, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (June 13).
lower
May 18, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 29, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 538.) (March 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 19, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
upper
Dec 5, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 16
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 16. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline