Invasion of privacy: distribution of sexually explicit materials: protection of plaintiff's identity.
Summary
Existing law creates a private right of action against a person who intentionally distributes a photograph or recorded image of another that exposes the intimate body parts, as defined, of that person or him or her engaged in specified sexual acts, without his or her consent, knowing that the other person had a reasonable expectation that the material would remain private, if specified conditions are met. Existing law authorizes a plaintiff in a civil proceeding pursuant to these provisions to use a pseudonym instead of his or her true name and to exclude or redact from all pleadings and documents filed in the action other identifying characteristics of the plaintiff. Existing law requires specified court documents, including motions and papers filed by parties, to be worded in a way that protects the name or other identifying characteristics of the plaintiff from public revelation. Existing law specifies that identifying characteristics include certain information for these purposes. This bill would require, in cases where a plaintiff uses a pseudonym, all other parties and their agents and attorneys to use the plaintiff's pseudonym in all pleadings, discovery documents, and other documents filed or served in the action, and at hearings, trial, and other court proceedings that are open to the public. The bill would require any party filing a pleading, discovery document, or other document in the action to exclude or redact identifying characteristics of the plaintiff from those documents, except as specified, and to file with the court and serve upon all other parties a confidential information form that includes the plaintiff's name and other identifying characteristics excluded or redacted. The bill would require the court to keep the plaintiff's name and excluded or redacted characteristics confidential. The bill would define identifying characteristics to include, among other information from which the plaintiff's identity can be discerned, telephone number, email address, social media profiles, online identifiers, as defined, and images of the plaintiff. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2017
Committee Review
Jul 2017
Senate Passage
May 2017
Assembly Passage
Aug 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Jan 18, 2017
Signed Sep 11, 2017
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2017 · Assembly Aug 24, 2017
How they voted
32–0
Passed
Total votes 32
May 30, 2017
D
Democratic22
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
10
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Sep 11, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 24, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-3)
assembly
Jul 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 19).
lower
Jun 27, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 20, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Jun 8, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and P. & C.P.
lower
May 30, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0)
senate
May 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
Apr 24, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 6, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 626.) (April 4).
upper
Jan 26, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 18, 2017
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 157
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 157. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline