Peace officers: release of records.
Summary
The California Public Records Act requires a state or local agency, as defined, to make public records available for inspection, subject to certain exceptions. Existing law requires any peace officer or custodial officer personnel records, as defined, and any records maintained by any state or local agency relating to complaints against peace officers and custodial officers, or any information obtained from these records, to be confidential and prohibits the disclosure of those records in any criminal or civil proceeding, except by discovery. Existing law describes exceptions to this requirement for investigations or proceedings concerning the conduct of peace officers or custodial officers, and for an agency or department that employs those officers, conducted by a grand jury, a district attorney's office, or the Attorney General's office. This bill would require, notwithstanding any other law, certain peace officer or custodial officer personnel records and records relating to specified incidents, complaints, and investigations involving peace officers and custodial officers to be made available for public inspection pursuant to the California Public Records Act. The bill would define the scope of disclosable records. The bill would require records disclosed pursuant to this provision to be redacted only to remove personal data or information, such as a home address, telephone number, or identities of family members, other than the names and work-related information of peace officers and custodial officers, to preserve the anonymity of complainants and witnesses, or to protect confidential medical, financial, or other information in which disclosure would cause an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy that clearly outweighs the strong public interest in records about misconduct by peace officers and custodial officers, or where there is a specific, particularized reason to believe that disclosure would pose a significant danger to the physical safety of the peace officer, custodial officer, or others. Additionally the bill would authorize redaction where, on the facts of the particular case, the public interest served by nondisclosure clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure. The bill would allow the delay of disclosure, as specified, for records relating to an open investigation or court proceeding, subject to certain limitations. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Senate Passage
May 2018
Assembly Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Feb 16, 2018
Signed Sep 30, 2018
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2018 · Assembly Sep 1, 2018
How they voted
21–8
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
May 30, 2018
D
Democratic21
95% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-27-4)
assembly
Aug 31, 2018
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 11. Page 6188.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 31, 2018
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 23, 2018
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 16, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 16).
lower
Jun 26, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 11, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 30, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-8-2)
senate
May 25, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4310.) (May 25).
upper
Apr 17, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4701.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 12, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 8, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 16, 2018
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 10 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Co
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Co
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Co
John M. W. Moorlach
RRepublican
Co
Kevin McCarty
DDemocratic
Co
Mark Stone
DDemocratic
Co
Reggie Jones-Sawyer
DDemocratic
Co
Ricardo Lara
DDemocratic
Co
Shirley N. Weber
DDemocratic
Co
Steve Bradford
DDemocratic
Co
Steve Glazer
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1421
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1421. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline