Electricity: load-serving entities: resource adequacy requirements.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing law requires the commission, in consultation with the Independent System Operator, to establish resource adequacy requirements for all load-serving entities, as defined, in accordance with specified objectives, including that the resource adequacy requirements facilitate development of new generating capacity and retention of existing generating capacity that is economic and needed. This bill would revise this objective to require that the resource adequacy requirements also facilitate development of new nongenerating and hybrid capacity and retention of existing nongenerating and hybrid capacity that is economic and needed. Existing law regarding resource adequacy requires each load-serving entity to maintain physical generating capacity adequate to meet its load requirements, including peak demand and planning and operating reserves, deliverable to locations and at times as may be necessary to provide reliable electric service. This bill would require the commission, in establishing resource adequacy requirements, to ensure the reliability of electrical service in California while advancing, to the extent possible, the state's goals for clean energy, reducing air pollution, and reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. Existing law requires the commission to determine and authorize the most efficient and equitable means for load-serving entities to achieve specified purposes when meeting their resource adequacy requirements. This bill would add as a specified purpose minimizing the need for backstop procurement by the Independent System Operator.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Senate Passage
May 2018
Assembly Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Feb 13, 2018
Signed Sep 27, 2018
Floor votes · Senate May 17, 2018 · Assembly Aug 16, 2018
How they voted
34–0
Passed
Total votes 34
May 17, 2018
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Sep 27, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 21, 2018
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5564.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 16, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-4)
assembly
Aug 16, 2018
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 8, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 8).
lower
Jun 21, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 25, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
May 17, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0)
senate
May 7, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 26, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 4850.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 4, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
upper
Feb 22, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 13, 2018
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Robert M. Hertzberg
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1136
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1136. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline