Spousal support award: convictions.

Existing law requires that in any proceeding for dissolution of marriage where one spouse has been convicted of an act of domestic violence against the other spouse within a specific time period, there is a rebuttable presumption affecting the burden of proof that any award of temporary or permanent spousal support to the abusive spouse should not be made. In a similar spousal support proceeding where one spouse has been convicted of a violent sexual felony perpetrated against the other spouse within a specific time period, existing law prohibits an award of spousal support to the convicted spouse from the injured spouse, requires the court to order attorney's fees to be paid from community assets, authorizes the date of legal separation to be the date of the incident giving rise to the conviction or earlier, and entitles the injured spouse to 100% of the community interest in the injured spouse's retirement and pension. This bill would modify the rebuttable presumption against making an award of temporary or permanent spousal support that is applicable to all criminal convictions for an act of domestic violence by distinguishing between a criminal conviction for a domestic violence felony and a domestic violence misdemeanor, and would define these 2 types of convictions. Under the bill, a criminal conviction for a domestic violence felony would prohibit awards relating to spousal support, attorney's fees, setting the date of separation, and retirement and pension benefits in a manner similar to a criminal conviction for a violent sexual felony. The bill would authorize the court to determine, based on the facts of the particular case, that one or more of these limitations on awards do not apply, if the convicted spouse presents documented evidence that he or she has been the victim of a violent sexual offense or domestic violence by the other spouse. Under the bill, a criminal conviction for a domestic violence misdemeanor or a misdemeanor that results in a term of probation that is based on domestic violence, as specified, would require a rebuttable presumption against making the same awards that are prohibited in cases of a criminal conviction for a violent sexual felony or domestic violence felony, except that there would not be a rebuttable presumption that the injured spouse is entitled to 100% of the community property interest in his or her retirement or pension benefits. The bill would authorize the court to determine, based on the facts of a particular case, that the injured spouse is entitled to up to 100% of the community property interest in his or her retirement and pension benefits based on specified factors, including the duration of the marriage and when, based on documented evidence, incidents of domestic violence occurred. This bill would establish different time periods for the effectiveness of the prohibition in cases of a criminal conviction for a violent sexual felony or domestic violence felony and the effectiveness of the rebuttable presumption in cases of a domestic violence misdemeanor or probationary term, as specified. The bill would make the above changes applicable to convictions that occurred on or after January 1, 2019. The bill would also define terms for its purposes, and would make technical changes to these provisions.