Criminal proceedings: mentally incompetent offenders.
Summary
Existing law prohibits a person from having his or her probation, mandatory supervision, postrelease community supervision, or parole revoked while that person is mentally incompetent. A defendant is mentally incompetent for these purposes if, as a result of mental disorder or developmental disability, the defendant is unable to understand the nature of the criminal proceedings or to assist counsel in the conduct of a defense in a rational manner. If a defendant is found mentally incompetent during postrelease community supervision or parole revocation hearings, existing law requires the court to dismiss the pending revocation matter and return the defendant to supervision, and authorizes the court take other action, including referring the matter to the public guardian of the county of commitment to initiate conservatorship proceedings only if there are no other reasonable alternatives to meet the defendant's mental health needs, as specified. This bill would provide a court with discretion when a defendant is found mentally incompetent during a postrelease community supervision or parole revocation hearing to either dismiss the pending revocation matter, as specified, or, if the court determines that there is a reasonable likelihood that the defendant may be restored to competency and returned to court to face the revocation proceedings, order the county sheriff to deliver the defendant to either a State Department of State Hospitals facility, as specified, or a public or private treatment facility, as specified, for treatment to restore the defendant to mental competency. The bill would require the defendant be returned to court to resume the revocation proceedings if the defendant is restored to competency within 180 days of arrest or before the defendant's date of discharge, whichever is earlier. The bill would alternatively require the court to dismiss the pending revocation matter and return the defendant to supervision, as specified, if the defendant is not restored to competency within 180 days of arrest or before the defendant's date of discharge, whichever comes first. By increasing the duties of local officials, including the county mental health director and county public guardian, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2018
Last action May 25, 2018
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
3
Committee
3
Amendments
1
May 25, 2018
Upper · Passed
May 25 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 17, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 16, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4627.) (April 10).
upper
Feb 22, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 13, 2018
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joel Anderson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1095
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1095. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline