Transportation electrification: electric vehicle charging infrastructure.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, among other things, requires the legislative body of each county and city to adopt a general plan for the physical development of the county or city and authorizes the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by counties and cities. Existing law requires a city, county, or city and county to approve an application for the installation of electric vehicle charging stations, as defined, through the issuance of specified permits unless the city or county makes specified written findings. Existing law provides that the implementation of consistent statewide standards to achieve the timely and cost-effective installation of electric vehicle charging stations is a matter of statewide concern. This bill would prohibit a city, county, or city and county from restricting which types of electric vehicles may access an electric vehicle charging station approved for passenger vehicles that both is publicly accessible and the construction of which was funded, at least in part, by the state or through moneys collected from ratepayers. (2) Existing law creates the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program, administered by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) , to provide, upon appropriation, competitive grants, revolving loans, loan guarantees, loans, or other appropriate funding measures to specified entities for those entities to develop and deploy innovative technologies that transform California's fuel and vehicle types to help attain the state's climate change policies. Existing law requires the Energy Commission to develop and adopt an investment plan to determine priorities and opportunities for the program. This bill would require the Energy Commission, in consultation with the State Air Resources Board (state board) , as part of the development of the investment plan, to assess whether charging station infrastructure is disproportionately deployed, as specified, and, upon finding disproportionate deployment, to use moneys from the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Fund, as well as other mechanisms, including incentives, to more proportionately deploy new charging station infrastructure, unless the commission makes a finding that the disproportionate deployment is reasonable and furthers state energy or environmental policy as articulated by the commission. (3) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations. Existing law requires the PUC, in consultation with the Energy Commission, the state board, electrical corporations, and the motor vehicle industry, to evaluate policies to develop infrastructure sufficient to overcome any barriers to the widespread deployment and use of plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles and, by July 1, 2011, to adopt rules that address specified related issues. Existing law requires the PUC, in consultation with the Energy Commission and state board, to direct electrical corporations to file applications for programs and investments to accelerate widespread transportation electrification to reduce dependence on petroleum, meet air quality standards, achieve the goals set forth in the Charge Ahead California Initiative, and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 and to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. This bill would require the PUC, in an existing proceeding, to consider: (A) facilitating the development of technologies that promote grid integration, including technologies that provide submetering capabilities to residential charging stations, if the PUC determines that these technologies and submetering capabilities are in the best interests of ratepayers, (B) exploring policies that support the development of technologies and rate strategies that can reduce the effects of demand charges on electric vehicles and fleets, and help accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles, and (C) adopting a tariff specific to heavy-duty electric vehicle fleets or electric trucks and buses that encourages the use of charging stations when there is excess grid capacity. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the PUC is a crime. Because some of the provisions of this bill are within the act and may require action by the PUC to implement their requirements, a violation of which would be a crime, these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Senate Passage
May 2018
Assembly Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Feb 5, 2018
Signed Sep 13, 2018
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2018 · Assembly Aug 29, 2018
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
May 30, 2018
D
Democratic21
100% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
38
Key actions
12
Committee
10
Amendments
3
Sep 13, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2018
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 6058.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 29, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0)
assembly
Aug 29, 2018
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 16, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 16).
lower
Jun 28, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 26, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on U. & E. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
Jun 18, 2018
Committee
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and U. & E.
lower
May 30, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
May 25, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 4301.) (May 25).
upper
Apr 26, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 25, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 4821.) (April 24).
upper
Apr 19, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Apr 18, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on T. & H. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 4717.) (April 17).
upper
Mar 21, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on E., U. & C. and T. & H.
upper
Feb 14, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 5, 2018
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ricardo Lara
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1000
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1000. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline