Employment safety: injury and illness prevention program.
Summary
Existing law, the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973, establishes certain safety and other responsibilities of employers and employees. Violations of the act under certain circumstances are a crime. Under existing law, the Division of Occupational Safety and Health enforces and administers the act's provisions. The act requires the division to issue a citation to an employer for specified violations of the act's provisions, as provided. Existing law requires every employer to establish, implement, and maintain an effective injury prevention program. Existing law requires the program to be written, except as specified, and to include certain elements. Existing law requires the employer to identify a person responsible for implementing the program and to correct unsafe and unhealthy conditions and work practices in a timely manner based on the severity of the hazard. This bill would require an employer who receives a written request for a paper or electronic copy of the written injury prevention program from a current employee, or his or her authorized representative, to comply with the request as soon as practicable, but no later than 10 business days from the date the employer receives the request. The bill would require the employer to provide the copy of the written injury prevention program free of charge. The bill would authorize the employer to take reasonable steps to verify the identity of a current employee or his or her authorized representative and to designate the person to whom a request is to be made. The bill would authorize the assertion of impossibility of performance, as specified, as an affirmative defense by an employer in any complaint alleging a violation of these new provisions. Because a violation of these provisions would be a crime under certain circumstances, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Vetoed
Jan 2018
Introduced Feb 16, 2017
Vetoed Jan 3, 2018
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2017
How they voted
41–22
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 70
May 31, 2017
D
Democratic48
85% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican21
85% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
4
Jan 3, 2018
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 14, 2017
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 11, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 46. Noes 28. Page 3124.).
lower
Sep 6, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 8 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jul 10, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 15, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Jun 14, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
May 31, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-22-7)
assembly
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Ayes 49. Noes 23. Page 1706.)
lower
Apr 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (April 26).
lower
Mar 30, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Monique Limón
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 978
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 978. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline