Developmental services: regional centers.
Summary
Under existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, the State Department of Developmental Services is authorized to contract with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities. Existing law requires a regional center to include specified information on its Internet Web site for the purpose of promoting transparency and access to public information, including, among other things, reports on all prior fiscal year expenditures from the regional center operations budget for all administrative services. This bill would require the State Department of Developmental Services to establish and maintain a page on its Internet Web site that includes a list of services purchased or provided to consumers by regional centers and descriptions of those services. The bill would require a regional center to also include on its Internet Web site a link to that page on the department's Internet Web site. Existing law states the right of individuals with developmental disabilities to make choices in their own lives, and requires public or private agencies that receive state funds to serve persons with developmental disabilities to respect the choices made by consumers and provide consumers with understandable information to aid in their choices. Existing law also grants these rights to consumers' parents, legal guardians, or conservators. This bill would extend the right to make choices and have those choices respected to consumers' authorized representatives. The bill would require regional centers to provide information to a consumer or his or her parents, legal guardian, conservator, or authorized representative in a manner that is culturally and linguistically appropriate, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 16, 2017
Signed Oct 4, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 14, 2017 · Assembly Sep 15, 2017
How they voted
32–0
Passed
Total votes 32
Sep 14, 2017
D
Democratic22
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
14
Committee
9
Amendments
7
Oct 4, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 15, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0)
assembly
Sep 14, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0)
senate
Sep 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3425.).
lower
Sep 14, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 8, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (September 1).
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 13, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 12, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 11).
upper
Jun 22, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Jun 7, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 24, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 3, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 3).
lower
Apr 18, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 6, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 4).
lower
Mar 21, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Chris Holden
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 959
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 959. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline