Land use regulations: local initiatives: voter approval.
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Law, among other things, authorizes the legislative body of any county or city to adopt ordinances to regulate land use. Existing law also establishes procedures by which city or county ordinances may be enacted or amended by initiative, including requiring that an ordinance proposed by the voters of the city or county be approved by a majority of the votes cast on the ordinance. This bill, in the case of an ordinance or an amendment of an ordinance that would reduce density or stop development or construction of any parcels located less than one mile from a major transit stop, as defined, within a city, county, or city and county that is proposed by the voters of the city, county, or city and county in accordance with specified law, would require that the proposed ordinance or amendment of an ordinance receive 55% of the votes cast on the ordinance in order to become effective. The bill would exclude from this requirement the proposal and submission to the voters of an ordinance or amendment of an ordinance by the legislative body of the city, county, or city and county and the adoption or amendment of a city, county, or city and county charter, and would exclude ordinances that apply to or implement amendments to a city or county general plan pertaining to certain lands specified in that general plan. The bill would also exclude ordinances that apply primarily to lands located outside an established city urban restriction boundary or ordinances that revise or continue previously established city urban restriction boundaries. This bill would limit application of this requirement to a county or city and county that had a population of 750,000 or more, or a city located within such a county, as of January 1, 2017. The bill would require the county counsel for the county or city and county in which the proposed ordinance or amendment of an ordinance would apply, or the city attorney of the city in which the proposed ordinance or amendment of an ordinance would apply, to determine whether the proposed ordinance or amendment of an ordinance would reduce density or stop development or construction of any parcels located less than one mile from a major transit stop within the city, county, or city and county. The bill would declare that it addresses a matter of statewide concern and would therefore apply to charter cities and charter counties. By requiring local officials to determine whether a proposed ordinance or amendment of an ordinance would reduce density or stop development or construction of any parcels located less than one mile from a major transit stop within a city, county, or city and county, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2017
Last action Sep 1, 2017
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
6
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 19, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 18, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (July 12).
upper
Jul 5, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E. & C.A. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Jun 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 8, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and E. & C.A.
upper
May 24, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 24).
lower
May 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 15, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 10, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 10).
lower
May 8, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
May 4, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. Read second time and amended.
lower
May 4, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and E. & R.
lower
Feb 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 943
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 943. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline