Electricity: procurement plans: integrated resource plans.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, while local publicly owned electric utilities, as defined, are under the direction of their governing boards. The Public Utilities Act requires the PUC to review and accept, modify, or reject a procurement plan for each electrical corporation and requires the procurement plan to include specified elements, among them a showing that it will achieve certain objectives. Existing law requires the PUC to identify a diverse and balanced portfolio of resources needed to ensure a reliable electricity supply that provides optimal integration of renewable energy in a cost-effective manner, and specifies the respective roles of electrical corporations and community choice aggregators in satisfying the portfolio needs for renewable integration. This bill would specify that a "diverse and balanced portfolio of resources" includes an appropriate mix of renewable capacity, including peaking, dispatchable, baseload, firm, and as-available capacity. The bill would additionally require the PUC to assess the need for, and benefits of, existing and future renewable baseload generation, and determine whether a procurement requirement for renewable baseload generation is necessary to meet the portfolio needs for renewable integration. Existing law requires the PUC to adopt a process for each load-serving entity, defined as including electrical corporations, electric service providers, and community choice aggregators, to file an integrated resource plan and a schedule for periodic updates to the plan to ensure that load-serving entities accomplish specified objectives. Existing law requires each load-serving entity to prepare and file an integrated resource plan consistent with those objectives on a time schedule directed by the PUC and subject to PUC review. This bill would require that an integrated resource plan ensure that the load-serving entity procures a balanced resource portfolio with an appropriate mix of renewable capacity, including peaking, dispatchable, baseload, firm, and as-available capacity. Existing law requires that the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility with an annual electrical demand exceeding 700 gigawatthours adopt an integrated resource plan and a process for updating the plan at least once every 5 years to ensure the utility achieves specified objectives. Existing law requires that the integrated resource plan and any updates be filed with the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) , requires the Energy Commission to review the plans and plan updates, and, if the Energy Commission determines a plan or plan update is deficient, to provide recommendations to correct the deficiencies. This bill would require the governing board, when reviewing the local publicly owned electric utility's integrated resource plan, to evaluate the mix of resources in the utility's total resource and renewable resource portfolios to ensure balanced portfolios with an appropriate mix of renewable capacity, including peaking, dispatchable, baseload, firm, and as-available capacity. The bill would require the governing board to assess the need for, and benefits of, existing and new renewable baseload generation and consider whether to procure renewable baseload generation for the utility. By placing additional requirements upon local publicly owned electric utilities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
Jun 2017
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2017
Last action Sep 1, 2017
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2017
How they voted
69–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 74
Jun 1, 2017
D
Democratic52
96% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican21
85% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
10
Committee
13
Amendments
7
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 13, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 10).
upper
Jun 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
upper
Jun 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 14, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
upper
Jun 1, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-5)
assembly
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 26).
lower
May 17, 2017
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 2, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 1, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 27, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 25, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (April 24).
lower
Apr 20, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 18, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
Apr 17, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & E. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 28, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
Mar 27, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & E. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 23, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on U. & E. and NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 920
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 920. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline