Beverage containers: polyethylene terephthalate.
Summary
Existing law requires that all rigid plastic bottles and rigid plastic containers sold in California be labeled with a code indicating the resin used to produce those bottles or containers. Existing law, among other things, specifies that the number 1 is to be used for bottles or containers that are made of polyethylene terephthalate. Under existing law, it is a crime to manufacture rigid plastic bottles or rigid plastic containers for use in California that are not properly labeled. This bill would, on and after October 1, 2018, define polyethylene terephthalate for the purposes of the labeling requirement as a plastic having certain characteristics, including, among other things, a melting peak temperature, as determined by a specified procedure, within a specified temperature range. Because the mislabeling of a bottle or container made of polyethylene terephthalate that does not meet those physical characteristics would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 16, 2017
Signed Oct 15, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 6, 2017 · Assembly Sep 11, 2017
How they voted
23–6
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 32
Sep 6, 2017
D
Democratic22
95% Yea
R
Republican10
60% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
4
Oct 15, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-1)
assembly
Sep 11, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3110.).
lower
Sep 6, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-6-3)
senate
Sep 6, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 8 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (September 1).
upper
Aug 28, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 21, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 6, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
May 18, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Apr 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Apr 18, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 6, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 3).
lower
Mar 22, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 21, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 20, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Bloom
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 906
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 906. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline