Land use: planning and zoning: initiatives.
Summary
(1) The California Constitution authorizes the electors of each city and county to exercise the powers of initiative and referendum under procedures provided by the Legislature. The Planning and Zoning Law requires a county or city to prepare and adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city. After the legislative body has adopted a general plan, that law authorizes the preparation of specific plans by the planning agency for the systematic implementation of the general plan for all or part of the area covered by the general plan. The Planning and Zoning Law provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by counties and cities. This bill would require that the city council of a city or the board of supervisors of a county have exclusive authority to adopt or amend a general plan, specific plan, or zoning ordinance, that would convert any discretionary land use approval necessary for a project to ministerial approval; change the land use or zoning designation of a parcel or parcels to a more intensive designation; or authorize more intensive land uses within an existing land use designation or zoning designation. The bill would specify that it would not apply to a legislative act that meets specified conditions, would not affect the referendum powers, and would not affect the power of a city council or board of supervisors to submit a ballot measure to the voters under 2 circumstances set out in the bill. (2) Under the Planning Zone Law, a city, county, or city and county may enter into a development agreement with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of the property. Existing law prohibits a city, county, or city and county from approving a development agreement unless the legislative body of that city or county finds that the agreement is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan. This bill would also prohibit a development agreement described above from being approved or amended by an ordinance adopted through the initiative process. The bill would state that this prohibition applies to a charter city. (3) The bill would include findings that the changes proposed by this bill addresses a matter of statewide concern, and therefore shall apply to all cities and counties, including charter cities.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
Jun 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Vetoed
Jan 2018
Introduced Feb 16, 2017
Vetoed Jan 3, 2018
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2017
How they voted
39–27
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 70
Jun 2, 2017
D
Democratic48
81% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican21
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
40
Key actions
12
Committee
15
Amendments
8
Jan 3, 2018
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 15, 2017
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 13, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 45. Noes 30. Page 3249.).
lower
Sep 12, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (September 12).
lower
Sep 7, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 6, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 8 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Aug 22, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 19).
upper
Jul 12, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and APPR.
upper
Jun 21, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 20, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 14, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on EQ. and E. & C.A.
upper
Jun 2, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-27-4)
assembly
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (May 26).
lower
May 17, 2017
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 11, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 10, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 25, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 19, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 5).
lower
Mar 29, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Mar 28, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E. & R. and NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jose Medina
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 890
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 890. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline