Psychologists: suicide prevention training.
Summary
Existing law, the Psychology Licensing Law, provides for the licensing and regulation of psychologists and requires a person applying for licensure as a psychologist to have completed specified coursework or training. Existing law also requires licensed psychologists to participate in continuing professional development as a prerequisite for renewing their licenses. Existing law requires a person applying for relicensure or for reinstatement to an active license status to certify under penalty of perjury that he or she has fulfilled the continuing professional development requirements. Existing law defines "continuing professional development" as certain continuing education learning activities and provides requirements for continuing education courses approved to meet the continuing professional development requirements. This bill, effective January 1, 2020, would require an applicant for licensure as a psychologist to complete a minimum of 6 hours of coursework or applied experience under supervision in suicide risk assessment and intervention. The bill would also require, effective January 1, 2020, as a one-time requirement, a licensed psychologist to have completed this suicide risk assessment and intervention training requirement prior to the time of his or her first renewal. The bill would also require, effective January 1, 2020, a person applying for reactivation or for reinstatement to have completed this suicide risk assessment and intervention training requirement. The bill would require that proof of compliance with this provision be certified under penalty of perjury that he or she is in compliance with this provision and be retained for submission to the board upon request. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2017
Committee Review
Aug 2017
Assembly Passage
Apr 2017
Senate Passage
Aug 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Jan 9, 2017
Signed Sep 1, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Aug 21, 2017 · Assembly Apr 20, 2017
How they voted
29–1
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 32
Aug 21, 2017
D
Democratic22
100% Yea
R
Republican10
70% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Sep 1, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2017
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 21, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-1-2)
senate
Jun 26, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 5, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 10, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Apr 20, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-1-7)
assembly
Apr 5, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 5).
lower
Mar 28, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 1.) (March 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 19, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Jan 10, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 9.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 89
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 89. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline