Petty theft: subsequent convictions.
Summary
Existing law establishes the penalty for petty theft as a fine not exceeding $1,000, or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding 6 months, or by both that fine and imprisonment. Existing law, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, enacted as an initiative statute by Proposition 47, as approved by the electors at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election, provides that a registered sex offender or a person with a prior conviction for certain serious or violent felonies, such as a sexually violent offense, who commits petty theft, is subject to imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year or in the state prison for 16 months, or 2 or 3 years. Existing law allows individuals charged with specified crimes to qualify for deferred entry of judgment. Under the existing deferred entry of judgment program, an eligible defendant may have entry of judgment deferred, upon pleading guilty to the offenses charged and entering a drug treatment program for 18 months up to 3 years. If the defendant completes the program, the criminal charges are dismissed. This bill would expand the enhanced petty theft penalties described above to a person who has a prior conviction for any serious or violent felony, and to any person who has 3 or more prior convictions for crimes such as petty theft or shoplifting, grand theft, and burglary. The bill would also authorize a court to grant deferred entry of judgment, for no less than 18 months and no longer than 3 years, to a defendant who has 3 or more prior convictions for those theft-related crimes, under certain conditions, including that the court is satisfied that the defendant suffers from a drug or alcohol addiction and the court finds that the addiction played a significant role in the commission of the offense. The bill would provide that if the person performs satisfactorily during the period of deferred entry of judgment, the criminal charges would be dismissed. The bill would establish procedures for deferred entry of judgment, including requiring county probation departments to file progress reports as directed by the court. The bill would additionally make conforming changes. The California Constitution authorizes the Legislature to amend an initiative statute by another statute that becomes effective only when approved by the electors. This bill would provide that it would become effective only upon approval of the voters, and would provide for the submission of this measure to the voters for approval at the statewide general election.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2017
Last action Feb 1, 2018
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Feb 1, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
lower
Jan 9, 2018
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, final hearing. Held without recommendation.
lower
Apr 20, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 19, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 4, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 28, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Cooper
DDemocratic
Co
Sabrina Cervantes
DDemocratic
Co
Tom Lackey
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 875
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 875. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline