Vital records: diacritical marks.
Summary
Existing law prescribes the duties of the State Registrar of Vital Statistics (State Registrar) and local registrars of births and deaths with respect to the registration of certificates of live birth, fetal death, or death, and marriage licenses. Existing law requires the State Registrar to prescribe and furnish all record forms for use in carrying out the provisions governing vital records and prohibits the use of any record form or format other than those prescribed by the State Registrar. Existing law requires every live birth, fetal death, death, and marriage that occurs in the state to be registered with the local registrar. Existing law requires certificates of live birth, fetal death, or death, and a marriage license to include specified information, such as the full name of the child on a certificate of live birth and the full names of the parties to be married on a marriage license. This bill would require the State Registrar to require the use of a diacritical mark on an English letter to be properly recorded, when applicable, on a certificate of live birth, fetal death, or death, and a marriage license and would require the use of a diacritical mark to be deemed an acceptable entry by the State Registrar. The bill would provide that the absence of a diacritical mark on a certificate of live birth, fetal death, or death, or a marriage license does not render the document invalid nor affect any constructive notice imparted by proper recordation of the document. The bill would authorize, if a name is not accurately recorded because of the absence of a diacritical mark on an English letter in any certificate of live birth, fetal death, death, or marriage already registered, the person asserting the omission, or the person's conservator, or if a minor, the person's parent or guardian, to submit a written request to the State Registrar for the issuance of a new certificate of birth, fetal death, death, or marriage stating the changes necessary to make the name correct. The bill would require the State Registrar to review the request and, if the request is accompanied with the payment of a specified fee, to issue a new certificate of live birth, fetal death, death, or marriage with the accurate name identified in the request.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Vetoed
Jan 2018
Introduced Jan 5, 2017
Vetoed Jan 3, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Sep 13, 2017 · Assembly May 31, 2017
How they voted
31–1
Passed
Total votes 32
Sep 13, 2017
D
Democratic22
100% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Jan 3, 2018
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 9, 2017
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 69. Noes 2. Page 3390.).
lower
Sep 14, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 13, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-1)
senate
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (September 1).
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 13, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 14, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
May 31, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-2-8)
assembly
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 26).
lower
Apr 26, 2017
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 22, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 19, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Jan 6, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 5.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 82
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 82. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline