AB 814 California Assembly · 2017-2018 Regular Session

Consumer protection: enforcement powers: investigatory subpoena.

Summary
The Unfair Competition Law (UCL) establishes a statutory cause of action for unfair competition, including any unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business act or practice and unfair, deceptive, untrue, or misleading advertising. Under this law, actions for relief are required to be prosecuted exclusively by the Attorney General, a district attorney, a county counsel authorized by agreement with the district attorney in actions involving violation of a county ordinance, a city attorney of a city having a population in excess of 750,000, or a city attorney in a city and county, or, with the consent of the district attorney, by a city prosecutor in a city having a full-time city prosecutor in the name of the people of the State of California, as specified, or by a person who has suffered injury in fact and has lost money or property as a result of the unfair competition. Existing law authorizes a district attorney, upon reasonable belief there has been a violation of the UCL or various other laws related to unfair business practices, to exercise all the powers granted to the Attorney General as a head of department to investigate the potential violation, including the authority to issue subpoenas. This bill would specify that this investigatory power granted to the Attorney General as a head of a department applies to a city attorney of a city having a population in excess of 750,000 or to a city attorney of a city and county when those city attorneys reasonably believe that there may have been a violation of the UCL.
Bill status failed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
Apr 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Governor
Introduced Feb 15, 2017 Last action Sep 16, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 6, 2017 · Assembly Apr 3, 2017

How they voted

310
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 32
Sep 6, 2017
D Democratic22
21 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican10
10 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
24
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Sep 6, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-1)
senate
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (September 1).
upper
Jun 26, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jun 13, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 10, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
upper
Apr 3, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-23-8)
assembly
Mar 22, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (March 21).
lower
Mar 16, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 15, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 16, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors