Civil actions: change of venue.
Summary
Existing law provides that the proper court for trial of a proceeding to enforce a child support obligation is the superior court in the county where the child resides. Existing law authorizes a court, on motion, to change the place of trial in certain cases, and requires the court to which the case is transferred to have and exercise jurisdiction over the case as if it had been originally commenced in that court. This bill would require a court transferring jurisdiction of a family law action to retain jurisdiction, if another court has not assumed jurisdiction over the action or proceeding, to make orders designed to prevent immediate danger or irreparable harm to a party or to the children involved in the matter, or to prevent the immediate loss or damage to property subject to disposition in the matter. The bill would require the Judicial Council, by January 1, 2019, to establish timeframes for a court to transfer and to assume jurisdiction over a family law action or proceeding. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to that provision.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
Apr 2017
Senate Passage
Aug 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Feb 15, 2017
Signed Sep 27, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2017 · Assembly Apr 20, 2017
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 32
Aug 31, 2017
D
Democratic22
95% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Sep 27, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 5, 2017
Lower · Passed
Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 31, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-1)
senate
Jul 10, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 21, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 6, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 10, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 20, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-4)
assembly
Apr 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1015.)
lower
Apr 5, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 5).
lower
Mar 21, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 20, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 16, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 16, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Bloom
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 712
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 712. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline