Pupil nutrition: almond milk.
Summary
Existing law prohibits the governing board of a school district from entering into a contract that grants exclusive or nonexclusive advertising or grants the right to the exclusive or nonexclusive sale of carbonated beverages, nonnutritious beverages, or nonnutritious food within the school district to a person, business, or corporation unless the governing board of the school district has adopted a policy after a public hearing to ensure that the school district has internal controls in place regarding the expenditure of the public funds. Existing law defines "nonnutritious beverages," for purposes of that provision, to exclude, among other beverages, milk, including, but not limited to, chocolate milk, soy milk, rice milk, and other similar dairy or nondairy milk. This bill would specify, for purposes of exclusion from the definition of "nonnutritious beverages," that milk also includes almond milk. Existing law permits the sale of only certain beverages to pupils at public schools. The beverages that may be sold include fruit-based and vegetable-based drinks, plain water, certain types of milk and nondairy milk and other similar nondairy milk, and, in high schools, electrolyte replacement beverages if those beverages meet certain nutritional requirements This bill would specify that almond milk is a nondairy milk that is authorized to be sold to pupils at public schools.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Aug 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Feb 15, 2017
Signed Sep 30, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2017 · Assembly Sep 5, 2017
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Aug 31, 2017
D
Democratic25
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 5, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-2)
assembly
Sep 5, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2923.).
lower
Aug 31, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Aug 31, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 20, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 14).
upper
Jun 1, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 11, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 10).
lower
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 16, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marc Levine
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 691
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 691. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline