Coastal resources: low- and moderate-income housing.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the California Coastal Act of 1976, establishes the California Coastal Commission and prescribes the powers and responsibilities of the commission with regard to the regulation of development along the California coast. The act requires any person wishing to perform or undertake any development in the coastal zone, as defined, to obtain a coastal development permit, except as provided. The act requires that lower cost visitor and recreational facilities be protected, encouraged, and, where feasible, provided. This bill would, until January 1, 2023, also require housing opportunities for persons of low and moderate income in the coastal zone to be protected, encouraged, and, where feasible, provided. The bill would require the commission, no later than January 1, 2019, to adopt interpretive guidelines for the development, implementation, and construction of housing opportunities for persons of low- and moderate-income in the coastal zone. (2) The act prescribes procedures for the approval and certification of a local coastal program by the commission, and provides for the delegation of development review authority to a local government, as defined, with a certified local coastal program. The act provides that no local coastal program shall be required to include housing policies and programs. This bill would suspend the operation of that provision specifying that local coastal programs are not required to include housing policies and programs beginning January 1, 2018, until January 1, 2023. (3) Provisions of the Planning and Zoning Law, known as the Mello Act, prohibit the conversion or demolition of residential dwelling units within a coastal zone, as defined and delineated in the Coastal Act, occupied by persons and families of low or moderate income unless provision has been made for the replacement of those dwelling units, as specified, and also requires that new housing developments constructed within a coastal zone provide, where feasible, housing units for persons and families of low or moderate income. That law also prohibits the conversion or demolition of any residential structure for purposes of a nonresidential use which is not "coastal dependent," as that term is defined in the Coastal Act, unless the local government first determines that residential use is no longer feasible in that location. In the event an application for a coastal development permit has not been acted upon prior to January 1, 1982, existing law prohibits the commission from imposing any condition or requirement with respect to housing for persons or families of low or moderate income on the proposed development when processing an application for a coastal development permit. Existing law requires an applicant for a coastal development permit to apply to the appropriate local government, as provided, to have that local government apply the requirements of the Mello Act to the proposed development. This bill would provide that the above provisions do not apply to a coastal development permit application acted upon between January 1, 2018, and January 1, 2023. (4) Existing property tax law establishes a partial exemption for properties used exclusively for rental housing and related facilities that are owned and operated by certain types of nonprofit entities or veterans' organizations and that meet specified requirements. Existing law, on or after January 1, 2015, prohibits a local government from entering into a payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) agreement with a property owner of a low-income housing project that is eligible for the exemption described above, and makes any PILOT agreement entered into in violation of this provision void and unenforceable. This bill would, on or after January 1, 2018, prohibit the commission from entering into a PILOT agreement with a property owner of a low-income housing project that is eligible for that exemption, and would make any PILOT agreement entered into in violation of that provision void and unenforceable.
Bill status
died
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
May 2017
Assembly Failed
Jun 2017
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2017
Last action Feb 1, 2018
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2017
How they voted
32–36
Failed · 9 other
Total votes 77
Jun 2, 2017
D
Democratic54
59% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican22
95% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Jun 2, 2017
Vote failed
Assembly Vote: fail (32-36-9)
assembly
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 6.) (May 26).
lower
May 17, 2017
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 2, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 27, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 26).
lower
Apr 20, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
Apr 18, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 17).
lower
Apr 3, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and H. & C.D.
lower
Feb 15, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Bloom
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 663
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 663. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline