Immigration consultants.
Summary
(1) Existing law regulates the practice of immigration consultants who provide nonlegal assistance or advice in an immigration matter. Existing law prohibits any person, for compensation, from engaging in the business or acting in the capacity of an immigration consultant in this state, unless that person complies with the regulations in state law governing the practice of immigration consultants, is an attorney, or is authorized by federal law to represent persons before the Board of Immigration Appeals or the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Existing law provides that immigration consultants, attorneys, notaries public, and organizations accredited by the United States Board of Immigration Appeals shall be the only individuals authorized to charge clients or prospective clients a fee for providing services associated with filing an application under a federal program referred to as the deferred action program, and prohibits immigration consultants, attorneys, notaries public, and organizations accredited by the United States Board of Immigration Appeals from participating in practices that amount to price gouging, as defined, when a client or prospective client solicits these services. Existing law establishes both criminal and civil penalties for a violation of specified provisions related to immigration consultants. This bill, beginning on January 1, 2020, would make it unlawful for a person, for compensation, other than a person authorized to practice law in this state, or a person authorized to represent others under federal law in an immigration matter, or a paralegal acting under the active supervision of an attorney, to engage in the business or act in the capacity of an immigration consultant in this state. The bill would provide that the provisions described above do not apply to an automated immigration form population service. The bill would require the Secretary of State, in coordination with specified state agencies, to develop an Internet Web site that would include specified information related to immigration services available in California, including information related to persons recognized or accredited as authorized providers of immigration services by the United States Department of Justice. The bill would remove notaries public from the provisions described above relating to the federal deferred action program, and would, instead, authorize a paralegal to charge fees for services related to the deferred action program and subject a paralegal to the price gouging prohibition described above. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2017
Last action Aug 30, 2018
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2017
How they voted
50–20
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 77
May 31, 2017
D
Democratic54
88% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican22
77% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
14
Committee
11
Amendments
9
Aug 24, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 17, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16).
upper
Jun 25, 2018
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 30, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Aug 24, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 18, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (July 11).
upper
Jun 26, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 22, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 14, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 31, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (50-20-7)
assembly
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 26).
lower
May 3, 2017
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 25, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 20, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (April 18).
lower
Mar 27, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 23, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 23, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 15, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
0 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 638
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 638. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline