Subsidized child care and development services: stages of child care: CalWORKs.
Summary
The Child Care and Development Services Act has a purpose to provide a comprehensive, coordinated, and cost-effective system of child care and development services for children from infancy to 13 years of age and their parents, including a full range of supervision, health, and support services through full- and part-time programs. The act provides that it is the intent of the Legislature to ensure that recipients and former recipients of CalWORKs are connected as soon as possible to local child care resources, make stable child care arrangements, and continue to receive subsidized child care services after they no longer receive aid as long as they require those services and meet eligibility requirements. The act establishes 3 stages of child care services through which a recipient of CalWORKs will pass. This bill would prohibit the first stage or the 2nd stage of child care services from being discontinued until confirmation is received from the administrator of the subsequent stage of child care that the family has been enrolled in the subsequent stage of child care, or that the family is ineligible for services in the subsequent stage of child care, in order to ensure that there is no disruption in child care services due to the planned transition between the stages of CalWORKs child care. Existing law makes confidential and prohibits the release of information about applicants for public social services. Notwithstanding this prohibition, existing law authorizes a county welfare department to share information necessary for the administration of child care programs and the CalWORKs program. This bill would require that specified information be made available by a county welfare department to a contractor that provides child care services. The bill would require, beginning no later than November 1, 2019, a county welfare department to provide a monthly report to stage 2 contractors containing specified information. The bill would require that report to be jointly designed with representatives from the State Department of Social Services, the County Welfare Directors Association of California, and Parent Voices, and in consultation with county welfare departments and the Statewide Automated Welfare System. The bill would require a county welfare department to provide training on security protocols and confidentiality of individual family data to a contractor who is given access to data pursuant to those provisions. By imposing new duties on county welfare departments, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Aug 2018
Vetoed
Sep 2018
Introduced Dec 7, 2016
Vetoed Sep 30, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2018 · Assembly May 30, 2017
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Aug 24, 2018
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
14
Committee
15
Amendments
3
Sep 30, 2018
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 29, 2018
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6810.).
lower
Aug 24, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Aug 24, 2018
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 17, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
upper
Jul 2, 2018
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 21, 2018
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 13, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 6, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 8, 2018
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 7, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 1, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 29, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 19, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 8, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on ED. and HUMAN S.
upper
May 30, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-5)
assembly
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 26).
lower
May 17, 2017
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 8, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 19, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Dec 8, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 7.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Miguel Santiago
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 60
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 60. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline