AB 576 California Assembly · 2017-2018 Regular Session

Pupil discipline: suspension and detention.

Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes the principal of the school, the principal's designee, or the district superintendent of schools to suspend a pupil from the school for any of specified reasons for no more than 5 consecutive schooldays. Existing law requires the suspension by the principal, the principal's designee, or the district superintendent of schools to be preceded by an informal conference conducted by the principal, the principal's designee, or the district superintendent of schools between the pupil and, whenever practicable, the teacher, supervisor, or school employee who referred the pupil to the principal, the principal's designee, or the district superintendent of schools. This bill would require, before the informal conference described above, the pupil's teacher, the principal, or the principal's designee to make a reasonable effort to notify the pupil's parent or guardian that the informal conference is scheduled to occur. To the extent this bill would impose additional duties on school districts in regards to the nondiscretionary suspension of a pupil, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law provides that, if the number of pupils suspended from school during the prior school year exceeded 30% of the school's enrollment, the school should consider doing at least one of specified alternatives to suspension, including, among others, detention. This bill would require, if a pupil has been issued detention, as defined, for a particular action or behavior pursuant to the provisions described above, before considering suspension for that pupil, the pupil's teacher to make a reasonable effort to notify the parent or guardian of the pupil that the pupil has been issued detention and may be considered for suspension if the pupil repeats the action or behavior, except as specified. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status failed 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2017 Last action Feb 1, 2018
Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
13
Key actions
0
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Feb 1, 2018
Assembly · Failed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Jan 31, 2018
Assembly · Failed
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
May 26, 2017
Assembly · Reported by committee
In committee: Held under submission.
May 17, 2017
Assembly · Referred to committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
May 4, 2017
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
May 2, 2017
Assembly · Amendment adopted
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 26).
Apr 5, 2017
Assembly · Reported by committee
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
Mar 23, 2017
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
Mar 22, 2017
Assembly · Amendment offered
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
Feb 27, 2017
Assembly · Referred to committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
Feb 15, 2017
Assembly · Reported by committee
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Marc Levine
Marc Levine
DDemocratic
CA
10